A Full-Size Perovskite Solar Panel Reaches 22% Efficiency and Passes Reliability Tests
A 0.72-square-metre perovskite solar module achieved a certified 22% total-area efficiency and passed the IEC 61215 qualification sequence. The result tackles two persistent barriers to commercial perovskite panels, scale and durability, but accelerated tests and a three-month field comparison cannot yet prove decades of service.
A perovskite solar panel large enough for commercial installation has crossed a threshold that small laboratory cells often miss: high efficiency after manufacturing at scale. A team led by Nanjing University reports a certified 22% total-area efficiency for a 0.72-square-metre module, alongside a complete pass through an international reliability test sequence.
The 30-second summary
- What happened? Researchers used lead carboxylates to protect vulnerable surfaces inside metre-scale perovskite modules. The best 0.72-square-metre panel reached 22% certified total-area efficiency.
- Why does it matter? Perovskites can be efficient in tiny cells, but defects, moisture and heat become harder to control as production expands. This result combines scale, performance and qualification testing in one device.
- What is the catch? The field comparison lasted only three months, and passing accelerated tests does not prove a 25-year outdoor lifetime or resolve lead recovery and recycling.
KEY NUMBER
22% certified total-area efficiency on a 0.72-square-metre module means the inactive borders and interconnections were included in the measurement.
Why this is more than another efficiency record
Perovskite cells absorb light efficiently and can be deposited from solution, but a headline number from a postage-stamp-sized cell says little about a saleable panel. Larger modules add electrical interconnections, wider coating areas and many more places where microscopic defects can drain current or admit moisture.
The new result advances from the laboratory scale discussed in NewTqnia's earlier coverage of a molecular layer for perovskite cells. In the peer-reviewed Nature paper, the authors report 24% certified aperture efficiency on an 810-square-centimetre module and 22% when the full 0.72-square-metre panel area is counted.
A protective layer that survives heat and moisture
The team treated the perovskite surface with lead carboxylates, especially lead dioleate. These molecules bind to under-coordinated lead sites, reduce electronic defects and form a water-repelling barrier. The coating was applied during ambient manufacturing by slot-die coating, a method that meters liquid across a moving surface rather than preparing one tiny cell at a time.
The Nanjing University account of the tests says a treated module lost 2% of its initial performance after 1,300 hours at 85 degrees Celsius and 85% relative humidity. A comparison module using an ammonium-based treatment lost 39% under the same conditions. The treated modules also endured 300 temperature cycles between minus 40 and 85 degrees Celsius with almost no reported loss.
What the qualification tests establish
The modules passed the IEC 61215 sequence, which exposes photovoltaic devices to damp heat, thermal cycling, ultraviolet light and mechanical stress. The IEC description of the standard makes the distinction clear: it is designed to reveal defects that could affect long-term operation, not to predict an exact service life for every climate or installation.
A short field comparison offers another encouraging signal. From March through May 2026, the study team compared a one-megawatt perovskite array with a 3.5-megawatt silicon TOPCon installation at the same site. Per unit of rated capacity, the perovskite array reportedly generated 3.42% more electricity in March, 3.79% more in April and 5.81% more in May. Those figures come from the research and industry partners and still need longer, independently audited operation.
Before we overstate the result
- IEC 61215 is a demanding qualification sequence, but it does not demonstrate the 25 to 30 years of service expected from established silicon panels.
- The outdoor comparison covers three months at one location. Seasonal performance, degradation, maintenance and yield across different climates remain unknown.
- Perovskite modules contain lead. Encapsulation, breakage control, collection and recycling must prevent leakage at commercial scale, a challenge detailed in an open review of lead management.
- Several authors are affiliated with Renshine Solar, which is developing the technology. Independent replication and third-party field data will be important.
What happens next
The useful next milestone is not another small increase in initial efficiency. Manufacturers need multi-year yield data, failure rates from large production batches, transparent cost figures and a closed process for recovering lead from damaged or retired modules.
The team has moved from a 17.2% total-area module reported in a 2025 Science paper to 22% at the same broad scale. That pace is notable, but commercial readiness will depend on whether factories can reproduce the passivation uniformly and whether the panels retain their output outside accelerated chambers.
Takeaway
This is a credible scale-up result because certification counted the whole panel and the device completed a recognized reliability sequence. The unresolved question is endurance: 1,300 hours of damp heat and three months outdoors are strong screening results, not a substitute for years of independently measured generation.
Verified topics and entities
Sources and citations5 sources
External references used to support the reporting in this article.
- Nature: Lead carboxylates passivation for meter-scale perovskite solar modules
- Nanjing University: Perovskite modules pass full IEC reliability tests
- Science: Earlier meter-scale perovskite module study
- IECEE: IEC 61215-1-2:2021 photovoltaic module qualification
- Open review: Lead management in perovskite solar cells
Published by
NewTqnia Energy Desk
An institutional editorial team within NewTqnia